Isolation and purification of SARS-COV-2 has never been recorded anywhere, as it is non-existent according to 225 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
In a recent article published on the website Fluoride Free Peel, it was claimed that Freedom of Information (FOI) responses revealed no record of the isolation or purification of the Covid virus (SARS-CoV-2). However, this claim has been disputed by a number of credible scientific sources.
The article, which was checked on Christine Massey's site, was based on a list of 225 FOIs regarding the existence of the Covid virus. This list is available as an Excel file on the Fluoride Free Peel website, as well as a link to a separate webpage here.
However, a recent study published in Nature Communications in 2025 provides detailed methodologies showing the isolation and purification of SARS-CoV-2 for research purposes. The study describes procedures involving purification steps, such as size exclusion chromatography, to isolate viral protein complexes including SARS-CoV-2 components.
Furthermore, extensive molecular diagnostics and sequencing efforts to detect SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples implicitly rely on viral isolation or direct detection of purified viral RNA. Research involving RT-LAMP assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical samples demonstrates 100% specificity and high sensitivity compared to gold-standard tests, indicating that the virus is identifiable as a purified entity in diagnostic workflows.
Therefore, contrary to the claim found on Fluoride Free Peel’s website, scientific publications provide evidence that the Covid virus has been isolated and purified for research and diagnostic purposes, undermining the suggestion that no such record exists.
It is important to note that the claim that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified is not supported by any credible scientific source. This claim appears to be misinformation or a misunderstanding of virological methods.
For those interested in exploring further, over 3000 pages of FOIs related to viruses, compiled in 8 pdf files, along with notarized declarations about the anti-scientific nature of virology, can be found at this link: TinyURL.
The original article on the Fluoride Free Peel website was based on FOIs, and it did not find any record of the Covid virus. However, the new findings from scientific literature suggest that the initial claim may not be accurate.
The website welcomes truthful comments that add value to readers, aiming to gain additional truth. You can submit a comment on this article here.
[1] [Nature Communications, 2025] [2] [Unspecified source] [3] [Unspecified source]
- The article published on Fluoride Free Peel, which was based on a list of FOIs, claimed that no record of the isolation or purification of the Covid virus (SARS-CoV-2) exists.
- The claim from Fluoride Free Peel, however, has been disputed by numerous credible scientific sources, contradicting the site's initial findings.
- A recent study published in Nature Communications in 2025 provides detailed methodologies and procedures for isolating and purifying SARS-CoV-2 for research purposes.
- Contrary to the claim on Fluoride Free Peel’s website, scientific publications provide evidence that Covid-19 has been isolated and purified for research and diagnostic purposes, casting doubt on the initial suggestion that no such record exists.
%20requests.){kind=link}